Devuan logs - #130, boring messages


Message sent to [email protected], [email protected]:


X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#130: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not available in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
Reply-To: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 12:33:01 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: report 130
X-Devuan-PR-Package: libopenjfx-java
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B.150228120518748
          (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Aug 2017 12:33:01 UTC
Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 9 Aug 2017 12:20:05 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from mail.dyne.org [178.62.188.7]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA2F18DE94
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  9 Aug 2017 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: tupac2.dyne.org; dkim=pass
	reason="2048-bit key; unprotected key"
	header.d=gmail.com [email protected] header.b=XmoRIFvc;
	dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id r9so4511180ita.3
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=rsiXlxsCOO7SspjDKhC2bq2Ho3apSC73z07rENIYRHY=;
        b=XmoRIFvcOW21YHon0QpPVgrXaDm5vZSuvgyC23TkWctuErq9dieLmWCxApjP+92IwN
         d3/RIXCENRsz6J10CRewnzqujNSUXV3zgmPAACm3vv5S/qe5+BaFvM+xyr/AFsX6pb1w
         ZRPw/+fGHSGk54F/Scqoq1EUaZVHvSe2sex7xEVuiS1CfhK4f7xFWGaDUQ+Kmjcc6/QF
         d//k0nmS9A1f3KksID7fyN/jP8pHyD31+KlBkYk1eKdxegbtWPhjJ1tqSQO+H09VPmJ4
         spB/lywki6etArcoooC7wZlmbnwJFexDK74bfC/JIy6CW8S9HcPhUhtJpEc2Qqnh0Xvm
         akOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=rsiXlxsCOO7SspjDKhC2bq2Ho3apSC73z07rENIYRHY=;
        b=TDYQ/E0cpdsAmM65bL66O2sW+j7bomLqGWiFL86T7QGQqDYg0WpO3uzuDUyRbfd1sr
         aLhFeqlsn+PI+E1UM8IgpRIlRkZGINDoA6CbprSjv5OCEdXiPhI6J2jA1xmndD1RZO7I
         0snh9Vb4mXqQxsld6ZGGl8Kq7ZciUBDZiapDqtfstgT2BQPlCcVngAidWBEa9FeCr2EX
         phvp5N3N6f5mlQQAtvhgIm+90G4jzNy8L1nueNMy5zgCfmb1TZuxT/meFCG/KQtiB1c8
         kwVlIU6fmrl3XNda3mmrQRqJ3b5ZGblDlfSWNITu6++mgdL1heClP9Peuxs2j4yAlwp/
         rnXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111qyo3SuUsn3x8gug1wa32lpVeBXXMoEfxypdpImdBe9eu2dKwI
	JeCct485ubv7TltC0fGb9qjzsHDELCcy
X-Received: by 10.36.103.69 with SMTP id u66mr6535648itc.46.1502280723108;
 Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.160.205 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 05:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:12:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tupac2

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Package: libopenjfx-java
Version: unknown (OpenJDK v.1.8.0_131)

When trying to install javafx on Devuan Jessie 1.0 (running on an ARM
architecture), i get the following error:

$ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports libopenjfx-java
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libopenjfx-java : Depends: libopenjfx-jni but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

The problem is that the libopenjfx-java package is not available from the
backports repository (apt-cache search libopenjfx-jni does not give a
result).

I would expect the package (libopenjfx-java) to be available similar to the
Debian backports repository (
https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/libopenjfx-jni) as
libopenjfx-java depends on it and is available from the Devuan backports
repository.

Best regards,
Rens van Bilthoven

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Package: libopenjfx-java<br></div><div>Version: unkno=
wn (OpenJDK v.1.8.0_131)<br></div><div><br>When trying to install javafx on=
 Devuan Jessie 1.0 (running on an ARM architecture), i get the following er=
ror:<br><br></div><div>$ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports libopenjfx-ja=
va<br>Reading package lists... Done<br>Building dependency tree=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <br>Reading state information... Done<br>Some pack=
ages could not be installed. This may mean that you have<br>requested an im=
possible situation or if you are using the unstable<br>distribution that so=
me required packages have not yet been created<br>or been moved out of Inco=
ming.<br>The following information may help to resolve the situation:<br><b=
r>The following packages have unmet dependencies:<br>=C2=A0libopenjfx-java =
: Depends: libopenjfx-jni but it is not installable<br>E: Unable to correct=
 problems, you have held broken packages.<br><br></div><div>The problem is =
that the libopenjfx-java package is not available from the backports reposi=
tory (apt-cache search libopenjfx-jni does not give a result).<br><br></div=
><div>I would expect the package (libopenjfx-java) to be available similar =
to the Debian backports repository (<a href=3D"https://packages.debian.org/=
jessie-backports/libopenjfx-jni">https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backpor=
ts/libopenjfx-jni</a>) as libopenjfx-java depends on it and is available fr=
om the Devuan backports repository.<br><br></div><div>Best regards,<br></di=
v><div>Rens van Bilthoven<br></div><div><br></div></div>

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e--


Message sent:


X-Loop: [email protected]
From: [email protected] (Devuan bug Tracking System)
To: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#130: Acknowledgement (libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not available in the backports repository (arch: armhf))
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack 130
X-Devuan-PR-Package: libopenjfx-java
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
Reply-To: [email protected]

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Devuan.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 [email protected]

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to [email protected] (and *not* to
[email protected]).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Devuan Bugs Owner
(administrator, Devuan bugs database)


Message received at [email protected]:


Received: (at control) by bugs.devuan.org; 7 Dec 2017 21:50:06 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 07 Dec 2017 22:50:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(Authenticated sender: [email protected])
	with ESMTPSA id 42956F60970
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:44:51 +0000
From: KatolaZ <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: ...
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1p/8YZFQDK16REep"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tupac3.dyne.org


--1p/8YZFQDK16REep
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

tags 133 ascii
tags 140 jessie
tags 90 jessie
tags 43 jessie
tags 167 ascii
tags 126 ascii
tags 151 jessie
tags 138 jessie
tags 117 jessie
tags 117 ascii
tags 127 jessie
tags 120 ascii
tags 20 jessie
tags 148 jessie
tags 148 ascii
tags 149 ascii
tags 149 jessie
tags 135 ascii
tags 136 jessie
tags 134 jessie
tags 134 ascii
tags 143 ascii
tags 143 jessie
tags 54 jessie
tags 54 ascii
tags 154 ascii
tags 154 jessie
tags 48 jessie
tags 87 ascii
tags 113 jessie
tags 141 ascii
tags 41 jessie
tags 119 jessie
tags 164 ascii
tags 64 jessie
tags 163 ascii
tags 158 jessie
tags 58 ascii
tags 58 jessie
tags 110 jessie
tags 160 jessie
tags 166 jessie
tags 99 jessie
tags 130 ascii
tags 130 jessie
tags 107 ascii
tags 162 ascii
tags 106 ascii
tags 155 jessie
tags 55 jessie
tags 131 jessie
tags 152 ascii
tags 79 jessie
tags 137 jessie
tags 36 jessie
tags 37 jessie
tags 145 ascii
tags 45 jessie
tags 49 jessie
close 30
close 68
close 64
merge 154 148
merge 90 22

--1p/8YZFQDK16REep
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAloptlMACgkQXyCzrgtfBi8qNwCffM2eYmJMgBkX3BOmYIkZZeAV
328AoIgAr1HPmqZKmB/wj/IgdUhbjAm4
=lI+l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1p/8YZFQDK16REep--


Message received at [email protected]:


Received: (at control) by bugs.devuan.org; 7 Dec 2017 21:50:06 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 07 Dec 2017 22:50:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(Authenticated sender: [email protected])
	with ESMTPSA id 42956F60970
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:44:51 +0000
From: KatolaZ <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: ...
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1p/8YZFQDK16REep"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tupac3.dyne.org


--1p/8YZFQDK16REep
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

tags 133 ascii
tags 140 jessie
tags 90 jessie
tags 43 jessie
tags 167 ascii
tags 126 ascii
tags 151 jessie
tags 138 jessie
tags 117 jessie
tags 117 ascii
tags 127 jessie
tags 120 ascii
tags 20 jessie
tags 148 jessie
tags 148 ascii
tags 149 ascii
tags 149 jessie
tags 135 ascii
tags 136 jessie
tags 134 jessie
tags 134 ascii
tags 143 ascii
tags 143 jessie
tags 54 jessie
tags 54 ascii
tags 154 ascii
tags 154 jessie
tags 48 jessie
tags 87 ascii
tags 113 jessie
tags 141 ascii
tags 41 jessie
tags 119 jessie
tags 164 ascii
tags 64 jessie
tags 163 ascii
tags 158 jessie
tags 58 ascii
tags 58 jessie
tags 110 jessie
tags 160 jessie
tags 166 jessie
tags 99 jessie
tags 130 ascii
tags 130 jessie
tags 107 ascii
tags 162 ascii
tags 106 ascii
tags 155 jessie
tags 55 jessie
tags 131 jessie
tags 152 ascii
tags 79 jessie
tags 137 jessie
tags 36 jessie
tags 37 jessie
tags 145 ascii
tags 45 jessie
tags 49 jessie
close 30
close 68
close 64
merge 154 148
merge 90 22

--1p/8YZFQDK16REep
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAloptlMACgkQXyCzrgtfBi8qNwCffM2eYmJMgBkX3BOmYIkZZeAV
328AoIgAr1HPmqZKmB/wj/IgdUhbjAm4
=lI+l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1p/8YZFQDK16REep--


Message sent:


MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#130: marked as done (libopenjfx-java depends on
 libopenjfx-jni but that package not available in the backports repository
 (arch: armhf))
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
 <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: closed 130
X-Devuan-PR-Package: libopenjfx-java
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: jessie ascii
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:20:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1673421602-12770-0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1673421602-12770-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: bug#130: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but=
 that package not available in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
has caused the Devuan bug report #130,
regarding libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not av=
ailable in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


--=20
130: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D130
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

------------=_1673421602-12770-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 9 Aug 2017 12:20:05 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from mail.dyne.org [178.62.188.7]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA2F18DE94
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  9 Aug 2017 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: tupac2.dyne.org; dkim=pass
	reason="2048-bit key; unprotected key"
	header.d=gmail.com [email protected] header.b=XmoRIFvc;
	dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id r9so4511180ita.3
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=rsiXlxsCOO7SspjDKhC2bq2Ho3apSC73z07rENIYRHY=;
        b=XmoRIFvcOW21YHon0QpPVgrXaDm5vZSuvgyC23TkWctuErq9dieLmWCxApjP+92IwN
         d3/RIXCENRsz6J10CRewnzqujNSUXV3zgmPAACm3vv5S/qe5+BaFvM+xyr/AFsX6pb1w
         ZRPw/+fGHSGk54F/Scqoq1EUaZVHvSe2sex7xEVuiS1CfhK4f7xFWGaDUQ+Kmjcc6/QF
         d//k0nmS9A1f3KksID7fyN/jP8pHyD31+KlBkYk1eKdxegbtWPhjJ1tqSQO+H09VPmJ4
         spB/lywki6etArcoooC7wZlmbnwJFexDK74bfC/JIy6CW8S9HcPhUhtJpEc2Qqnh0Xvm
         akOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=rsiXlxsCOO7SspjDKhC2bq2Ho3apSC73z07rENIYRHY=;
        b=TDYQ/E0cpdsAmM65bL66O2sW+j7bomLqGWiFL86T7QGQqDYg0WpO3uzuDUyRbfd1sr
         aLhFeqlsn+PI+E1UM8IgpRIlRkZGINDoA6CbprSjv5OCEdXiPhI6J2jA1xmndD1RZO7I
         0snh9Vb4mXqQxsld6ZGGl8Kq7ZciUBDZiapDqtfstgT2BQPlCcVngAidWBEa9FeCr2EX
         phvp5N3N6f5mlQQAtvhgIm+90G4jzNy8L1nueNMy5zgCfmb1TZuxT/meFCG/KQtiB1c8
         kwVlIU6fmrl3XNda3mmrQRqJ3b5ZGblDlfSWNITu6++mgdL1heClP9Peuxs2j4yAlwp/
         rnXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111qyo3SuUsn3x8gug1wa32lpVeBXXMoEfxypdpImdBe9eu2dKwI
	JeCct485ubv7TltC0fGb9qjzsHDELCcy
X-Received: by 10.36.103.69 with SMTP id u66mr6535648itc.46.1502280723108;
 Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.160.205 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 05:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:12:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not
 available in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tupac2

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Package: libopenjfx-java
Version: unknown (OpenJDK v.1.8.0_131)

When trying to install javafx on Devuan Jessie 1.0 (running on an ARM
architecture), i get the following error:

$ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports libopenjfx-java
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libopenjfx-java : Depends: libopenjfx-jni but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

The problem is that the libopenjfx-java package is not available from the
backports repository (apt-cache search libopenjfx-jni does not give a
result).

I would expect the package (libopenjfx-java) to be available similar to the
Debian backports repository (
https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/libopenjfx-jni) as
libopenjfx-java depends on it and is available from the Devuan backports
repository.

Best regards,
Rens van Bilthoven

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Package: libopenjfx-java<br></div><div>Version: unkno=
wn (OpenJDK v.1.8.0_131)<br></div><div><br>When trying to install javafx on=
 Devuan Jessie 1.0 (running on an ARM architecture), i get the following er=
ror:<br><br></div><div>$ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports libopenjfx-ja=
va<br>Reading package lists... Done<br>Building dependency tree=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <br>Reading state information... Done<br>Some pack=
ages could not be installed. This may mean that you have<br>requested an im=
possible situation or if you are using the unstable<br>distribution that so=
me required packages have not yet been created<br>or been moved out of Inco=
ming.<br>The following information may help to resolve the situation:<br><b=
r>The following packages have unmet dependencies:<br>=C2=A0libopenjfx-java =
: Depends: libopenjfx-jni but it is not installable<br>E: Unable to correct=
 problems, you have held broken packages.<br><br></div><div>The problem is =
that the libopenjfx-java package is not available from the backports reposi=
tory (apt-cache search libopenjfx-jni does not give a result).<br><br></div=
><div>I would expect the package (libopenjfx-java) to be available similar =
to the Debian backports repository (<a href=3D"https://packages.debian.org/=
jessie-backports/libopenjfx-jni">https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backpor=
ts/libopenjfx-jni</a>) as libopenjfx-java depends on it and is available fr=
om the Devuan backports repository.<br><br></div><div>Best regards,<br></di=
v><div>Rens van Bilthoven<br></div><div><br></div></div>

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e--

------------=_1673421602-12770-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 130-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 11 Jan 2023 07:19:39 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id TKtgHghjvmMMYwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:36 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 63EEDB85; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04955226
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pFVOY-00084q-LY; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 31161 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#130: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that
 package not available in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Closing: no longer an issue.

Mark
------------=_1673421602-12770-0--

Message sent:


MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#130 closed by Mark Hindley <[email protected]> (Re:
 bug#130: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not
 available in the backports repository (arch: armhf))
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
 <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: they-closed 130
X-Devuan-PR-Package: libopenjfx-java
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: jessie ascii
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:20:05 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1673421605-12770-1"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1673421605-12770-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the libopenjfx-java package:

#130: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not availa=
ble in the backports repository (arch: armhf)

It has been closed by Mark Hindley <[email protected]>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Mark Hindley <mark@hin=
dley.org.uk> by
replying to this email.


--=20
130: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D130
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

------------=_1673421605-12770-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 130-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 11 Jan 2023 07:19:39 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id TKtgHghjvmMMYwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:36 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 63EEDB85; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04955226
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pFVOY-00084q-LY; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 31161 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:19:34 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#130: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that
 package not available in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Closing: no longer an issue.

Mark
------------=_1673421605-12770-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 9 Aug 2017 12:20:05 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from mail.dyne.org [178.62.188.7]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA2F18DE94
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  9 Aug 2017 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: tupac2.dyne.org; dkim=pass
	reason="2048-bit key; unprotected key"
	header.d=gmail.com [email protected] header.b=XmoRIFvc;
	dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id r9so4511180ita.3
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=rsiXlxsCOO7SspjDKhC2bq2Ho3apSC73z07rENIYRHY=;
        b=XmoRIFvcOW21YHon0QpPVgrXaDm5vZSuvgyC23TkWctuErq9dieLmWCxApjP+92IwN
         d3/RIXCENRsz6J10CRewnzqujNSUXV3zgmPAACm3vv5S/qe5+BaFvM+xyr/AFsX6pb1w
         ZRPw/+fGHSGk54F/Scqoq1EUaZVHvSe2sex7xEVuiS1CfhK4f7xFWGaDUQ+Kmjcc6/QF
         d//k0nmS9A1f3KksID7fyN/jP8pHyD31+KlBkYk1eKdxegbtWPhjJ1tqSQO+H09VPmJ4
         spB/lywki6etArcoooC7wZlmbnwJFexDK74bfC/JIy6CW8S9HcPhUhtJpEc2Qqnh0Xvm
         akOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=rsiXlxsCOO7SspjDKhC2bq2Ho3apSC73z07rENIYRHY=;
        b=TDYQ/E0cpdsAmM65bL66O2sW+j7bomLqGWiFL86T7QGQqDYg0WpO3uzuDUyRbfd1sr
         aLhFeqlsn+PI+E1UM8IgpRIlRkZGINDoA6CbprSjv5OCEdXiPhI6J2jA1xmndD1RZO7I
         0snh9Vb4mXqQxsld6ZGGl8Kq7ZciUBDZiapDqtfstgT2BQPlCcVngAidWBEa9FeCr2EX
         phvp5N3N6f5mlQQAtvhgIm+90G4jzNy8L1nueNMy5zgCfmb1TZuxT/meFCG/KQtiB1c8
         kwVlIU6fmrl3XNda3mmrQRqJ3b5ZGblDlfSWNITu6++mgdL1heClP9Peuxs2j4yAlwp/
         rnXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111qyo3SuUsn3x8gug1wa32lpVeBXXMoEfxypdpImdBe9eu2dKwI
	JeCct485ubv7TltC0fGb9qjzsHDELCcy
X-Received: by 10.36.103.69 with SMTP id u66mr6535648itc.46.1502280723108;
 Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.160.205 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 05:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rens von Bilthoven <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:12:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAALF2wTcMhUdBk3ymWv3_TbZjz=vfCWFvV=e_WoyXqH3uiUJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: libopenjfx-java depends on libopenjfx-jni but that package not
 available in the backports repository (arch: armhf)
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tupac2

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Package: libopenjfx-java
Version: unknown (OpenJDK v.1.8.0_131)

When trying to install javafx on Devuan Jessie 1.0 (running on an ARM
architecture), i get the following error:

$ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports libopenjfx-java
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libopenjfx-java : Depends: libopenjfx-jni but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

The problem is that the libopenjfx-java package is not available from the
backports repository (apt-cache search libopenjfx-jni does not give a
result).

I would expect the package (libopenjfx-java) to be available similar to the
Debian backports repository (
https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/libopenjfx-jni) as
libopenjfx-java depends on it and is available from the Devuan backports
repository.

Best regards,
Rens van Bilthoven

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Package: libopenjfx-java<br></div><div>Version: unkno=
wn (OpenJDK v.1.8.0_131)<br></div><div><br>When trying to install javafx on=
 Devuan Jessie 1.0 (running on an ARM architecture), i get the following er=
ror:<br><br></div><div>$ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports libopenjfx-ja=
va<br>Reading package lists... Done<br>Building dependency tree=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <br>Reading state information... Done<br>Some pack=
ages could not be installed. This may mean that you have<br>requested an im=
possible situation or if you are using the unstable<br>distribution that so=
me required packages have not yet been created<br>or been moved out of Inco=
ming.<br>The following information may help to resolve the situation:<br><b=
r>The following packages have unmet dependencies:<br>=C2=A0libopenjfx-java =
: Depends: libopenjfx-jni but it is not installable<br>E: Unable to correct=
 problems, you have held broken packages.<br><br></div><div>The problem is =
that the libopenjfx-java package is not available from the backports reposi=
tory (apt-cache search libopenjfx-jni does not give a result).<br><br></div=
><div>I would expect the package (libopenjfx-java) to be available similar =
to the Debian backports repository (<a href=3D"https://packages.debian.org/=
jessie-backports/libopenjfx-jni">https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backpor=
ts/libopenjfx-jni</a>) as libopenjfx-java depends on it and is available fr=
om the Devuan backports repository.<br><br></div><div>Best regards,<br></di=
v><div>Rens van Bilthoven<br></div><div><br></div></div>

--001a11481b18da9c45055650fc4e--

------------=_1673421605-12770-1--

Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.

Devuan Bugs Owner <[email protected]>.
Last modified: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:39:01 UTC