Devuan logs - #260, boring messages

Message sent to [email protected], [email protected]:

Subject: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Reply-To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:33:01 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:17:58 -0500
From: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716

Package: gufw

+ On a fresh ascii install conducted less than 24 hours ago,
  gufw was installed, but it segfaults with the following details:

  /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec: line 13: 18344 Segmentation fault
  python3 ${LOCATIONS[${i}]} $1

+ The underlying ufw firewall does function correctly, as
  tested from the command line.

-- 
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0

Message sent:

X-Loop: [email protected]
From: [email protected] (Devuan bug Tracking System)
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#260: Acknowledgement (gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Precedence: bulk
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
Reply-To: [email protected]

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Devuan.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 [email protected]

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to [email protected] (and *not* to
[email protected]).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Devuan Bugs Owner
(administrator, Devuan bugs database)

Message sent to [email protected], [email protected]:

Subject: bug#260: Please forward upstream
Reply-To: KatolaZ <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: KatolaZ <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:33:02 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:24:45 +0100
From: KatolaZ <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jxjchozzrd53nzcq"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)


--jxjchozzrd53nzcq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

gufw in Devuan comes directly from Debian. Hence, this bug should be
forwarded to bugs.debian.org

Regards

--jxjchozzrd53nzcq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQSOWdaqRF79tKFTPVpfILOuC18GLwUCW+1XfQAKCRBfILOuC18G
L3T1AJ4rVpEJfqdxSV+QV+obH+ULvvL3VwCgjsN/gKnofarNaBlp+RHpcA/3JF8=
=lYWi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jxjchozzrd53nzcq--

Message sent:

X-Loop: [email protected]
From: [email protected] (Devuan bug Tracking System)
To: KatolaZ <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#260: Info received (was Please forward upstream)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Precedence: bulk
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack-info 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: [email protected]

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 [email protected]

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to [email protected], as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Devuan Bugs Owner
(administrator, Devuan bugs database)

Message sent to [email protected], [email protected]:

X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Reply-To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: [email protected]
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:50:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B260.167587138517483
          (code B ref 260); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:50:01 +0000
Received: (at 260) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Feb 2023 15:49:45 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id H5H5HGvE42NMNAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:48:59 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 623C2B14; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3293C84
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 15:48:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pPmgr-0004V2-25; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:48:57 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 3502 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:48:56 -0000
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:48:56 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Message-ID: <Y+PEaBr8iWaNj9Q/@hindley.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Boruch.

Are you using Wayland? If so, I think this is the same as

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-ufw/+bug/1592380

The fix[1] is to run

xhost si:localuser:root

Mark

[1]  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-ufw/+bug/1592380/comments/6

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at 260) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Feb 2023 15:49:45 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id H5H5HGvE42NMNAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:48:59 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 623C2B14; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3293C84
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 15:48:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pPmgr-0004V2-25; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:48:57 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 3502 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:48:56 -0000
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:48:56 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Message-ID: <Y+PEaBr8iWaNj9Q/@hindley.org.uk>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Boruch.

Are you using Wayland? If so, I think this is the same as

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-ufw/+bug/1592380

The fix[1] is to run

xhost si:localuser:root

Mark

[1]  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-ufw/+bug/1592380/comments/6

Message sent to [email protected], [email protected]:

X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Reply-To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: [email protected]
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:02:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
References: <[email protected]> <Y+PEaBr8iWaNj9Q/@hindley.org.uk> <[email protected]>
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B260.16758792913506
          (code B ref 260); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:02:01 +0000
Received: (at 260) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Feb 2023 18:01:31 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id qMxKCWbj42MbPQAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:01:10 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 198DAB14; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 18:01:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.15.18; helo=mout.gmx.net; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2E584
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 18:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 ([151.205.99.250]) by
 mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id
 1M4b1o-1pQMyv08SU-001lQ2; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 19:01:03 +0100
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 13:01:00 -0500
From: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <20230208180100.hd7g3peilbs6phyq@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y+PEaBr8iWaNj9Q/@hindley.org.uk>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:NTxNtSn7vqWtUJOrskUjMkJc+L0GQfm7p+qYxfBcJnKGnazi0ym
 JauvBQPHNwrCr1lCO1No6xDd739LaLHXib5DFj/Pu+dO4nGT5dbaIZ1H5J+XhSGaZRfYYOh
 /cWN/fpMVwem8PIT1O0pq7Xm8uwq1B8Uf8wnuaTmvpielAHNwvoftS8ydeqv9pnIEQ5PXnw
 MCThvP2ldq/HSlVFTtoKg==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:AOgVfcClkWg=;plvyLZTSnCFjW87hyOO47latirI
 OypuQbw/DJBrcncxWDd6x1vVsGHjyWthpIOkBzZtI6xsPy0iAsicD/EjMQIOKborFnjxtb5fv
 Amt0q7//hIlfcub/mD2HO2zCr0jySR6aDUe30eR2qORYscaxoVjuM4CsI/hpEdyTtqoeml1qu
 qO3DJBGdmedR3ikayFn/K11bLh73Jw+opOJGLHyiQmaZ0sDuaDXrkUqqvLvfR0TGKOb+9K3ve
 Q7r39sW0ScOQA7TPUCN93EJCf0ijp0fDWfQSQ/QV/sed3J9CebmcA8S7iM7xRdVryT/C+rnCB
 pdZrQ4CBOuo/YdmbkGbJ+TjmSPlV0/nx305NlzlOp8Muhi0lMEYVpXP0HggdC0clG3Peunhok
 kgSdhaDECHtSRWoXjepDctG1y1mbumhbgao/vZK3CSr2mkoax2SqyYqwP2NhHPLPgZ2wAXgz2
 grZHRydM+DWUmLBWP2aE1MxJIJn/2rauxhMSaVGkBmnwYDj1Xff01Wxh3BH+AR55iZDEygtaz
 +/RqEk+JmTZgkqvmHLqW44oKC6/YokmRdnPRrznDmLeVn2HLQXxpazB94H2WZtMCL9FmQn5VZ
 eFsdgZhLoso30MrUDRjZHLQNE+ff3MsxdkHUBRskaFq7+Ey5KbIGvQtNEw6TudVaQLJsKA4V5
 6n+ZVTE28LQM8ykz03AYYii0E399U+LuZYBSYOGc4wsIv77g0gyCREOaGM5moVz3f9cC3jroz
 KjExTShPPR9Rorjh5dbDdXMjtsuko1DMgBlavW9GCogQz+S62jlXjsU10V9AQ/o+k4gDQfh4o
 GBM0fXUvxAuBRgtDzY65KuMQ5VZdiAOXTwDqpJDYOWe133R+e57mVtmwPREwWjKVDS2/KYGPs
 G2n+mN5GfA39gt82rUJp3/LiUkeTvhpdZkE3rPlnaOV1COKNPo2qNjRkcjk3pWI7DV6HzP1FS
 VNawwA==

I filed the bug report in year 2016. At this point, in year 2023, I'm
not able to help. Sorry.

On 2023-02-08 15:48, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Boruch.
>
> Are you using Wayland? If so, I think this is the same as
>
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-ufw/+bug/1592380
>
> The fix[1] is to run
>
> xhost si:localuser:root
>
> Mark
>
> [1]  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-ufw/+bug/1592380/comments/6
>

-- 
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#260: Info received (bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <20230208180100.hd7g3peilbs6phyq@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack-info 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:02:02 +0000

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this bug report.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 [email protected]

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to [email protected].

Please do not send mail to [email protected] unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
260: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D260
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#260: marked as done (gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
 <[email protected]>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: closed 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:32:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1675881122-7262-0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1675881122-7262-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
has caused the Devuan bug report #260,
regarding gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


--=20
260: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D260
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

------------=_1675881122-7262-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 15 Nov 2018 05:20:02 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 06:20:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21633F608F6
	for <[email protected]>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 06:18:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com
 (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id
 0Lbi2Z-1fdQ6E0OYF-00lFEj for <[email protected]>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018
 06:18:01 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:17:58 -0500
From: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Subject: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1WajRs4JF5qVmTh+wW8A7XnX5keoh9FmvTRVGSl2wxD3RZrH3xT
 OQVDBCh+9zkWws/ETI7AoE92jTlyOG77HeUfV4Q2G1/kRzQN/ObnQbwL0vZR2cmC+Wqf6QI
 63sUEIF0zTcp3u6Z9tFpzEAsvtA1TVSloZya9UJvnPGBhPVy5own55d3ShG7reBWFZzu3Wz
 i6jLKtAp0v6uD8xbW4j3w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kU674OTrvdc=:mH2rIE/+WzMFb6VY2azwb2
 guw6rNqzYbrymnjlvrSirmzKXTCAQHWrkv5mL6nDcgCPjg9t7WDck8QRMlB0ASU7R1Og9lHga
 EF4+atj5+ZOtnxUEmvr4I6cnvsDxzo2JB/iTHHp9AVvqnt35gGyA370q/3IhXCv9GWp87VOKo
 Xe7Ho2+Z9mpkOeGDLovCZCY9Tz/XZE4l1eAO+OAPL4Sv6wHHCxp69KNY2UeIP4/SKB5Y4ujyH
 2Jyr233qkuJI03tYwCgXFQooBF6nkMoFxHtLg5CxxwhIl1yMwDBE8ckwSj5Z4Nx4/TXB30ElK
 x+D73MyfYNls4+QPtcrTM+HjFPY+BkyjEUvbZylwSJow4dxIUrmCYyhyYArUjuCdKfpk3CZRo
 uUKfd6XygAm1DQ4aXJWCza6hvTZW5Sf/ocpRog42iQo188Daj/NLe3M6Y0TQIImuBha0ABtZD
 8bR7ARTb/O6duOUJH9aUcY2MocjgVhTEErT7sxj5G0WdZKwo0ZQVXsh6S8er5Zh5xkDv97EFv
 0NEsE4wlSKg4QqqDD1jnvYAllGTHq/MLrh5CKcd5jJdYcZzb6RjpAWx2u6wN8zoF+yiCkAmHC
 eWmycJJ+ppWhpv7Deec0BqWUBBcF6WoRRh6w2rcsn+5xMeFNpkyDaqDdD6gR+LKGB5dZK7RfG
 nZTiWaml0Sjms6FbFQncIuIRul1tVQo+xzKsKD5ob9KeEVc5VhzZOPA7y3G6DUJqiGffNHeu5
 biWxqMXsIiBeF3h5Ye+vTHhupleOYoipxPwdk41Q3FAUapIjlj/iNF8b+vByzO2yJWV9YD506
 Lv2QYWp69ZqDdd30FNFOWjrF5KlPjkOT3/uUSJ7IgfG14dbr8xc+ozAgx3aI6R5rhzKrlxvWN
 /F2JLNaPbSQD9KXEiRUpctKBN3eMR/aW3U0ycubDz2OKHzQiVqM9x/dWP3Pl1v

Package: gufw

+ On a fresh ascii install conducted less than 24 hours ago,
  gufw was installed, but it segfaults with the following details:

  /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec: line 13: 18344 Segmentation fault
  python3 ${LOCATIONS[${i}]} $1

+ The underlying ufw firewall does function correctly, as
  tested from the command line.

-- 
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0

------------=_1675881122-7262-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 260-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Feb 2023 18:31:33 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id 8HjpIy3q42NHPgAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:30:05 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 8907FB14; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E34A84
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pPpCj-0005Sy-TW; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 19315 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:30:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
 <Y+PEaBr8iWaNj9Q/@hindley.org.uk>
 <20230208180100.hd7g3peilbs6phyq@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230208180100.hd7g3peilbs6phyq@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:01:00PM -0500, Boruch Baum wrote:
> I filed the bug report in year 2016. At this point, in year 2023, I'm
> not able to help. Sorry.

OK, thanks for your reply.

Closing.

Mark
------------=_1675881122-7262-0--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#260 closed by Mark Hindley <[email protected]> (Re:
 bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
 <[email protected]>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: they-closed 260
X-Devuan-PR-Package: gufw
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:32:04 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1675881124-7262-1"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1675881124-7262-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the gufw package:

#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec

It has been closed by Mark Hindley <[email protected]>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Mark Hindley <mark@hin=
dley.org.uk> by
replying to this email.


--=20
260: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D260
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

------------=_1675881124-7262-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 260-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Feb 2023 18:31:33 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id 8HjpIy3q42NHPgAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:30:05 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 8907FB14; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E34A84
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pPpCj-0005Sy-TW; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 19315 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 08 Feb 2023 18:30:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#260: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
 <Y+PEaBr8iWaNj9Q/@hindley.org.uk>
 <20230208180100.hd7g3peilbs6phyq@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230208180100.hd7g3peilbs6phyq@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:01:00PM -0500, Boruch Baum wrote:
> I filed the bug report in year 2016. At this point, in year 2023, I'm
> not able to help. Sorry.

OK, thanks for your reply.

Closing.

Mark
------------=_1675881124-7262-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 15 Nov 2018 05:20:02 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by fulcanelli with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 06:20:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21633F608F6
	for <[email protected]>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 06:18:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com
 (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id
 0Lbi2Z-1fdQ6E0OYF-00lFEj for <[email protected]>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018
 06:18:01 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:17:58 -0500
From: Boruch Baum <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Subject: gufw: segfault gufw-pkexec
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1WajRs4JF5qVmTh+wW8A7XnX5keoh9FmvTRVGSl2wxD3RZrH3xT
 OQVDBCh+9zkWws/ETI7AoE92jTlyOG77HeUfV4Q2G1/kRzQN/ObnQbwL0vZR2cmC+Wqf6QI
 63sUEIF0zTcp3u6Z9tFpzEAsvtA1TVSloZya9UJvnPGBhPVy5own55d3ShG7reBWFZzu3Wz
 i6jLKtAp0v6uD8xbW4j3w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kU674OTrvdc=:mH2rIE/+WzMFb6VY2azwb2
 guw6rNqzYbrymnjlvrSirmzKXTCAQHWrkv5mL6nDcgCPjg9t7WDck8QRMlB0ASU7R1Og9lHga
 EF4+atj5+ZOtnxUEmvr4I6cnvsDxzo2JB/iTHHp9AVvqnt35gGyA370q/3IhXCv9GWp87VOKo
 Xe7Ho2+Z9mpkOeGDLovCZCY9Tz/XZE4l1eAO+OAPL4Sv6wHHCxp69KNY2UeIP4/SKB5Y4ujyH
 2Jyr233qkuJI03tYwCgXFQooBF6nkMoFxHtLg5CxxwhIl1yMwDBE8ckwSj5Z4Nx4/TXB30ElK
 x+D73MyfYNls4+QPtcrTM+HjFPY+BkyjEUvbZylwSJow4dxIUrmCYyhyYArUjuCdKfpk3CZRo
 uUKfd6XygAm1DQ4aXJWCza6hvTZW5Sf/ocpRog42iQo188Daj/NLe3M6Y0TQIImuBha0ABtZD
 8bR7ARTb/O6duOUJH9aUcY2MocjgVhTEErT7sxj5G0WdZKwo0ZQVXsh6S8er5Zh5xkDv97EFv
 0NEsE4wlSKg4QqqDD1jnvYAllGTHq/MLrh5CKcd5jJdYcZzb6RjpAWx2u6wN8zoF+yiCkAmHC
 eWmycJJ+ppWhpv7Deec0BqWUBBcF6WoRRh6w2rcsn+5xMeFNpkyDaqDdD6gR+LKGB5dZK7RfG
 nZTiWaml0Sjms6FbFQncIuIRul1tVQo+xzKsKD5ob9KeEVc5VhzZOPA7y3G6DUJqiGffNHeu5
 biWxqMXsIiBeF3h5Ye+vTHhupleOYoipxPwdk41Q3FAUapIjlj/iNF8b+vByzO2yJWV9YD506
 Lv2QYWp69ZqDdd30FNFOWjrF5KlPjkOT3/uUSJ7IgfG14dbr8xc+ozAgx3aI6R5rhzKrlxvWN
 /F2JLNaPbSQD9KXEiRUpctKBN3eMR/aW3U0ycubDz2OKHzQiVqM9x/dWP3Pl1v

Package: gufw

+ On a fresh ascii install conducted less than 24 hours ago,
  gufw was installed, but it segfaults with the following details:

  /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec: line 13: 18344 Segmentation fault
  python3 ${LOCATIONS[${i}]} $1

+ The underlying ufw firewall does function correctly, as
  tested from the command line.

-- 
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0

------------=_1675881124-7262-1--