Received: (at 448-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 22 May 2020 09:10:01 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.0.beta4) for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Fri, 22 May 2020 09:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (mohindley.plus.com [81.174.245.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C794CF60CC1 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk) by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1jc3db-0006hT-Ns for [email protected]; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:06:48 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 2707 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 22 May 2020 09:06:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:06:43 +0100 From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: devuan-project: runit-init should be included in Init Message-ID: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FAKE_REPLY_C,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on tupac3.dyne.org On Sat, 09 May 2020 11:31:14 +0900 (JST) Ryutaroh Matsumoto <[email protected]> wrote: > Package: devuan-project > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > In the init freedom page for Devuan Beowulf, > https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/ Updated. Thanks. Mark
Ryutaroh Matsumoto <[email protected]>
:Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
:Ryutaroh Matsumoto <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 9 May 2020 02:40:05 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.0.beta4) for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Sat, 09 May 2020 02:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail002.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp (mail002.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp [131.112.13.102]) by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CAC7F608E5 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 9 May 2020 04:31:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 172.22.40.202 by mail002.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp with Mail2000 ESMTP Server V7.00(2643:0:AUTH_RELAY) (envelope-from <[email protected]>); Sat, 09 May 2020 11:31:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail002.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp (mail002.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp [131.112.13.102]) by drweb05.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AA522C17 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 9 May 2020 11:31:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from 126.255.18.103 by mail002.nap.gsic.titech.ac.jp with Mail2000 ESMTPA Server V7.00(2635:0:AUTH_LOGIN) (envelope-from <[email protected]>); Sat, 09 May 2020 11:31:15 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 11:31:14 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[email protected]> Subject: devuan-project: runit-init should be included in "Init Freedom" page. To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]> From: Ryutaroh Matsumoto <[email protected]> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on tupac3.dyne.org Package: devuan-project Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, In the init freedom page for Devuan Beowulf, https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/ runit is listed but it is not said that runit is also available in Devuan Beowulf. It should be included (unless you are going to remove runit-init from Beowulf). On the other hand, the meanings of the word "init" are very different between the "Init Freedom" page https://beta.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/ and the Devuan Installer Beta 2 https://beta.devuan.org/os/documentation/install-guides/beowulf/img/025initchoice.png The former means /sbin/init while the latter means NOT /sbin/init but "rc". The word "init" must be consistent in all parts of the Devuan project, in my opinion (do you agree?). See also another bug report https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=446 Best regards, Ryutaroh Matsumoto -- System Information: Distributor ID: Debian Description: Devuan GNU/Linux 3 (beowulf) Release: 3 Codename: beowulf Architecture: x86_64 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Ryutaroh Matsumoto <[email protected]>
:Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
.
Full text available.[email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
:bug#448
; Package devuan-project
.
Full text available.Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.
Devuan Bugs Owner <[email protected]>.
Last modified:
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:39:01 UTC