Devuan bug report logs - #624
chimaera-backports priority isn't set correctly

Package: amprolla; Reported by: Jorenz Paragas <[email protected]>; merged with #623; Done: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>; Maintainer for amprolla is (unknown).

---

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at 623-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 25 Oct 2021 18:30:03 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.0.beta4)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D17F60C63
	for <[email protected]>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:28:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1mf4hm-0006NY-06
	for [email protected]; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:28:18 +0100
Received: (nullmailer pid 25539 invoked by uid 1000);
	Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:28:17 -0000
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:28:17 +0100
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#623: chimaera-backports repo being used unprompted- missing
 pin priority
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <6Zc5ETEJjsV2JjVTTN2cEP045oez8cWlYDehi_zMZ0s-Ehv67ObS8EyBu8APG2pfvVUAcJhxEsA8wBxVUbIffGNkyqVfUsHTPqrEeldi95w=@protonmail.com>
 <83NzMF00IFDqRfqD0u5Zw7yVBnr95I3EXPgVBT1dPRsxwPgIyd6emko8Jnrs3tAPaL_PE4xt8RasfdRi9eq7D2zJ7QuDwgk2Q-jYA0d6vQM=@protonmail.com>
 <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on tupac3.dyne.org



On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 07:58:55AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this. I have changed the configuration in DAK. It may take
> up to a day to be propagated. I will check again tomorrow before closing the bug
> as fixed.

The configuration change has propagated to the mirrors.

Closing.

Mark

---

Merged 623 624 Request was from Mark Hindley <[email protected]> to [email protected]. Full text available.

---

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 24 Oct 2021 00:20:02 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.0.beta4)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 00:20:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB56F60B55
	for <[email protected]>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 02:19:47 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: vm6.ganeti.dyne.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com [email protected] header.b="PaYDqWCF";
	dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id t7so7010172pgl.9
        for <[email protected]>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 17:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=0MePFqMfoxVPQKrYBtI/WvQhoyI+TafDCdSJnhxZkKE=;
        b=PaYDqWCFrWJ01/enUg/wHouBZEhKH/aNieUgTebMnhGjUS1HeSwYkUSnPeU2vUyJoA
         4CaN0TXokNWBT/UmaqquNUGDT8OG2qdJuTLUzvuMjsXWz8Vf8HFzz5C2sI+FgeGgYxuO
         ltGXb5W77WYyaMmY4I0gymuxLsfkxGo1WkesA+vqB0X9Un8gB6rD1iLD5Mrt9A5+fNzv
         fDMV1aJYw0k8rkHSqVHKiZqlkF4Upd1P68Qkrxr1hNOZiNWH+Q3U8WoBqsRnnNDPmxD7
         OyJGRu7eRBPbxYymkf7iXoqSu0LzFOVNvVsZtborSeY/vyh5gYLEbh9i6WHeg6dbJkO2
         eNkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=0MePFqMfoxVPQKrYBtI/WvQhoyI+TafDCdSJnhxZkKE=;
        b=BW75X3myPHAHvkpiPkrsRMKaDp8FbO+Oz+g5ayNLcgJx+ZUsAUrWFNoxvMBzF7Yxeo
         geyoKsYLpb4pQEqBotI5pLTfdV5HiddxYdomCKiF5Jen8Zo4dt+DCinjSgTHwJ1OR3Zk
         4M5kP0U88QqKyqNoRBJszIdI0Z+o1o5h54h3t6qehpoxdr3RlmuiB70wh4dy4dL7gIQg
         SzZY4EXb89rdRrhtwj0k7HuE4khXhdfgpPTCb9x5YKYef65UvNiurmD+/CfQ6nDJTve/
         YRhK1BUjRRZpmx2DTyuMZ2PQ3rn7ponha5nlS/zU5RfNEGB1uknES4uHs6fXgD4zVS4P
         KlEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jFIjHmqgkFwPlrv0qC/mYRnA+Hlo9i1GwFTIydQfR/8VgirVu
	7K14u0z16xy2ix8SgaXwFbeXbggFGJnnpmnOWPbzDMwWc7A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHQXnd7apdc/mnxyRVd2Mc3m/r5PS3hjWSIgBvHVDli0mtccrZcleNU4Wredp9tG4m+MJwnH5Kv3tZhyfCLB0=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:9212:: with SMTP id o18mr6715277pgd.392.1635034785245;
 Sat, 23 Oct 2021 17:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jorenz Paragas <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 17:19:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE4D+1TNALpEFGGgDxLaKCaeJ3jKTA99fvXScZmMdzE=3jmsXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: chimaera-backports priority isn't set correctly
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on tupac3.dyne.org

Package: amprolla
Version: chimaera

Hello,

Currently, if the chimaera-backports repository is enabled, packages
from there have priority over those in the main repository because the
Release file for chimaera-backports is missing the following lines:

NotAutomatic: yes
ButAutomaticUpgrades: yes

The beowulf-backports repository works properly since those lines are
present in its Release file.

Thanks in advance,
Jorenz Paragas

---

Acknowledgement sent to Jorenz Paragas <[email protected]>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Evilham <[email protected]>. Full text available.

---

Report forwarded to [email protected], Evilham <[email protected]>:
bug#624; Package amprolla. Full text available.

---