Devuan logs - #749, boring messages

Message sent to [email protected], none, [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:

Subject: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Reply-To: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: none, [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:26:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=202.238.237.3; helo=mo-sw.mose-mail.jp; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.2
From: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 20:44:01 +0900
Message-ID: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Package: initscripts
Version: 3.06-2devuan1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>

Dear Maintainer,

Every time I `poweroff` my machine, I see error message flash by that
complain about `halt` being called with unsupported options.  I think
I have tracked this down to /etc/init.d/halt making blind assumptions
about the options supported by the `halt` command.

Said command may be provided by any of a number of packages.  A quick
`apt-file search sbin/halt` turns up

  $ apt-file search sbin/halt
  bfh-container: /sbin/halt
  finit-sysv: /sbin/halt
  molly-guard: /sbin/halt
  progress-linux-container: /sbin/halt
  runit-init: /sbin/halt
  systemd-sysv: /sbin/halt
  sysvinit-core: /sbin/halt

Mine happens to be

  $ ls -l /sbin/halt
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 10 03:45 /sbin/halt -> /lib/runit/shutdown

where the symlink target is from the runit package.  According to the
manual page, my halt command only supports -f, -w and -n short options.

The /etc/init.d/halt script may invokes the halt command with -d and -f
options and may add any of -i, -p and -h.

BTW, I also have runit-init installed which provides the `poweroff` and
`halt` commands that get executed.  Seeing that runit-init depends on
initscripts one could argue that runit-init should support those options
in which case feel free to forward this to that package (in the Debian
BTS).  From past experience, its maintainer is open to init freedom ;-)

If not a runit-init issue, this may still be worthwhile to upstream to
the Debian BTS for initscripts.  Even the systemd-sysv `halt` does not
claim to support -i or -h options in its manual page :-o

-- System Information:
Architecture: x86_64

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: runit (via /run/runit.stopit)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages initscripts depends on:
ii  sysv-rc         3.06-2devuan1
ii  sysvinit-utils  3.06-2devuan1

Versions of packages initscripts recommends:
ii  e2fsprogs  1.46.6-1
pn  psmisc     <none>

initscripts suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#749: Acknowledgement (initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls
 halt with unsupported options)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: initscripts
X-Devuan-PR-Source: sysvinit
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:26:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with Devuan.

You can follow progress on this bug here: 749: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/=
bugreport.cgi?bug=3D749.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
  none, olaf meeuwissen <[email protected]>
(after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one).

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Devuan Developers <[email protected]>

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to [email protected].

Please do not send mail to [email protected] unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
749: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D749
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

Message sent to [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:

Subject: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Reply-To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:44:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp> <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Lorenzo Puliti <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>

Olaf,

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:44:01PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Package: initscripts
> Version: 3.06-2devuan1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> Every time I `poweroff` my machine, I see error message flash by that
> complain about `halt` being called with unsupported options.  I think
> I have tracked this down to /etc/init.d/halt making blind assumptions
> about the options supported by the `halt` command.

Thanks. We keep bumping into issues similar to this with the different halt
implementations.

I don't immediately have a really good solution.

> Said command may be provided by any of a number of packages.  A quick
> `apt-file search sbin/halt` turns up
> 
>   $ apt-file search sbin/halt
>   bfh-container: /sbin/halt
>   finit-sysv: /sbin/halt
>   molly-guard: /sbin/halt
>   progress-linux-container: /sbin/halt
>   runit-init: /sbin/halt
>   systemd-sysv: /sbin/halt
>   sysvinit-core: /sbin/halt
> 
> Mine happens to be
> 
>   $ ls -l /sbin/halt
>   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 10 03:45 /sbin/halt -> /lib/runit/shutdown
> 
> where the symlink target is from the runit package.  According to the
> manual page, my halt command only supports -f, -w and -n short options.

My gut reaction is that runit's halt should either support the sysvinit options
even if noop.

Lorenzo,

I have no real experience of runit yet. What is the relationship between it an
initscripts? When are the initscripts used? Is there something you can do within
src:runit to avoid this?

Thanks

Mark

Message sent to [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:

Subject: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Reply-To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Lorenzo <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 01:16:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp> <[email protected]> <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=178.21.23.139; helo=knopi.disroot.org; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 02:14:24 +0100
From: Lorenzo <[email protected]>
To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Cc: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
Mark Hindley <[email protected]> wrote:

> > where the symlink target is from the runit package.  According to
> > the manual page, my halt command only supports -f, -w and -n short
> > options.
> 
> My gut reaction is that runit's halt should either support the
> sysvinit options even if noop.

The current behavior of runit's halt is that options -d -h -p -i
are ignored except that a warning is printed (the exit status is zero).
They are not really noop, since in the original sysvinit implementation
each of -d -h -p -i imply halting/poweroff the system, so that's what
runit's halt does after "ignoring" such options.
I've tested in the past that if I turn -d -h -p -i into noop
the switch sysvinit --> runit-init is broken, so I don't want to do
that.
What is left on runit's side is that I can silence the warning (but I
don't think is a good behavior for a program to silently ignore some
options - it can be documented in the man page though) or add a special
case in 'run_sysv_script' so that 'reboot' and 'halt' scripts are
skipped during runit shutdown sequence.

> 
> Lorenzo,
> 
> I have no real experience of runit yet. What is the relationship
> between it an initscripts? When are the initscripts used?

Runit is currently borrowing from sysvinit (initscripts package)
scripts to initialize and shutdown the system; it runs sequentially
scripts from /etc/rcS.d/ to boot the system and scripts from /etc/rc0.d/
or /etc/rc6.d/ for shutdown/reboot.

> Is there
> something you can do within src:runit to avoid this?
I think reassigning this to runit as Debian bug with severity minor is
appropriate.

Lorenzo

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mark

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#749: Info received (bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt
 calls halt with unsupported options)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack-info 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: initscripts
X-Devuan-PR-Source: sysvinit
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 01:16:07 +0000

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this bug report.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Devuan Developers <[email protected]>

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to [email protected].

Please do not send mail to [email protected] unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
749: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D749
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

Message sent to [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:

X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with  unsupported options
Reply-To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Lorenzo <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:44:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: initscripts
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
X-Devuan-PR-Source: sysvinit
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B749.167880133716971
          (code B ref 749); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:44:02 +0000
Received: (at 749) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 13:42:17 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:42:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id Q+GwBX15EGS7KwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:41:17 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id F2A3C66D; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:41:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=178.21.23.139; helo=knopi.disroot.org; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D03C34
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E034179B
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:40:53 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id nZr5G76lRZ_Y for <[email protected]>;
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:40:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:40:45 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
	t=1678801252; bh=3KmSeChDPLV9q/j9ENoeDv4Q0hn2LoyiH03sSmNhHvw=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To;
	b=UAyAv5lXqVlNUj3FVL+65QeQAVoBgBbvFbLwW2VCgyTJe0gFQAfGP/v4hL5v5J8YC
	 LLwAZHnQ7PKfTyqRYDp6hB/MyItoxwRjkXD5ZDjZXgFR5z0Ls9/LJuclXS+KVKOza0
	 G36Q+Gh7UA5fQv8l2HSIKc4+95gPfsEqu6Tywwz0JJ9K+2m3+2BCVE/yzrpBcgMIC1
	 UVPVw+a5fBlxlwPlXlv4HlHj0Tk/cwx2JzsTATc613cwIaJzBFEdKe4XdBmH9Bj0hU
	 NbWduGjQ2qdl63CzgFl32AkVZuBXHnbdLlGidXoXcuHYi3qJqhiHVU/jJ928R3W8PX
	 2sJwowN5o6xhA==
From: Lorenzo <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
> Mark Hindley <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Is there
> > something you can do within src:runit to avoid this?
> I think reassigning this to runit as Debian bug with severity minor is
> appropriate.
> 
I've just opened a bug against runit-init
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032943
I think this bug can be closed

Lorenzo

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#749: Info received (bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt
 calls halt with  unsupported options)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack-info 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: initscripts
X-Devuan-PR-Source: sysvinit
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:44:04 +0000

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this bug report.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Devuan Developers <[email protected]>

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to [email protected].

Please do not send mail to [email protected] unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
749: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D749
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

Message sent to [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:

X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Reply-To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:06:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: initscripts
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp> <[email protected]> <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
X-Devuan-PR-Source: sysvinit
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B749.167881347210562
          (code B ref 749); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:06:01 +0000
Received: (at 749) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id w7+QAvaoEGTnLwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:50 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id E4695970; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900AA66E;
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pc83Z-0004JZ-NZ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 7289 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:24 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <ZBCo3KI/[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Control: tags -1 debian
Control: forwarded -1  https://bugs.debian.org/1032943

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
> > Mark Hindley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > Is there
> > > something you can do within src:runit to avoid this?
> > I think reassigning this to runit as Debian bug with severity minor is
> > appropriate.
> > 
> I've just opened a bug against runit-init

Lorenzo,

Thanks. Setting tags and forwarded.

Mark

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at 749) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id w7+QAvaoEGTnLwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:50 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id E4695970; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900AA66E;
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pc83Z-0004JZ-NZ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 7289 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:24 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with
 unsupported options
Message-ID: <ZBCo3KI/[email protected]>
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
 <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Control: tags -1 debian
Control: forwarded -1  https://bugs.debian.org/1032943

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
> > Mark Hindley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > Is there
> > > something you can do within src:runit to avoid this?
> > I think reassigning this to runit as Debian bug with severity minor is
> > appropriate.
> > 
> I've just opened a bug against runit-init

Lorenzo,

Thanks. Setting tags and forwarded.

Mark

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at 749) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id w7+QAvaoEGTnLwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:50 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id E4695970; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900AA66E;
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pc83Z-0004JZ-NZ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 7289 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:24 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with
 unsupported options
Message-ID: <ZBCo3KI/[email protected]>
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
 <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Control: tags -1 debian
Control: forwarded -1  https://bugs.debian.org/1032943

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
> > Mark Hindley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > Is there
> > > something you can do within src:runit to avoid this?
> > I think reassigning this to runit as Debian bug with severity minor is
> > appropriate.
> > 
> I've just opened a bug against runit-init

Lorenzo,

Thanks. Setting tags and forwarded.

Mark

Message sent to Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>:

X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Reply-To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-To: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:06:09 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: report 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: initscripts
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: debian
References: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp> <[email protected]> <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
X-Devuan-PR-Source: sysvinit
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=U749.167881347210564
          (code U ref 749); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:06:09 +0000
Received: (at 749-submitter) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id w7+QAvaoEGTnLwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:50 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id E4695970; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900AA66E;
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pc83Z-0004JZ-NZ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 7289 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:25 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:24 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <ZBCo3KI/[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Control: tags -1 debian
Control: forwarded -1  https://bugs.debian.org/1032943

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:43:30 +0000
> > Mark Hindley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > Is there
> > > something you can do within src:runit to avoid this?
> > I think reassigning this to runit as Debian bug with severity minor is
> > appropriate.
> > 
> I've just opened a bug against runit-init

Lorenzo,

Thanks. Setting tags and forwarded.

Mark

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at control) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 17:18:07 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id QbofMfyrEGSjMAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:44 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id A373966F; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B3EACD
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pc8Ft-0004Pb-SI
	for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:10 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 10584 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:09 -0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: reassign 749 to runit-init
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:09 +0000
User-Agent: devscripts bts/2.23.2
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

reassign 749 runit-init 
thanks

Message received at [email protected]:

Received: (at control) by bugs.devuan.org; 14 Mar 2023 17:18:07 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id QbofMfyrEGSjMAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:44 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id A373966F; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B3EACD
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk)
	by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1pc8Ft-0004Pb-SI
	for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:10 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 10584 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:09 -0000
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: reassign 749 to runit-init
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:16:09 +0000
User-Agent: devscripts bts/2.23.2
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

reassign 749 runit-init 
thanks

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#749: marked as done (initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt
 with unsupported options)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <ZJFHjz3rmHNATEx/@hindley.org.uk> <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: closed 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: runit-init
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: debian
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:32:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1687242722-7710-0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1687242722-7710-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Your message dated Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:30:39 +0100
with message-id <ZJFHjz3rmHNATEx/@hindley.org.uk>
and subject line Fixed in Debian #1032943
has caused the Devuan bug report #749,
regarding initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


--=20
749: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D749
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

------------=_1687242722-7710-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Mar 2023 12:25:37 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:25:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id 6JWxIWt+CGTnLQAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:24:11 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 77B6796F; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 12:24:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=202.238.237.3; helo=mo-sw.mose-mail.jp; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mo-sw.mose-mail.jp (mo-sw1801-0.mose-mail.jp [202.238.237.3])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45DD5895
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 12:24:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mo-sw.mose-mail.jp (mose-mo-sw1801) id 328CNvXR009297; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:23:57 +0900
Received: from basecamp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mbox.mose-mail.jp (mose-mbox1802) id 328CNrAu007501
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:23:54 +0900
Received: from olaf (uid 1000)
	(envelope-from [email protected])
	id 19f426
	by basecamp (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13);
	Wed, 08 Mar 2023 21:23:53 +0900
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.2
From: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Subject: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 20:44:01 +0900
Message-ID: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Package: initscripts
Version: 3.06-2devuan1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>

Dear Maintainer,

Every time I `poweroff` my machine, I see error message flash by that
complain about `halt` being called with unsupported options.  I think
I have tracked this down to /etc/init.d/halt making blind assumptions
about the options supported by the `halt` command.

Said command may be provided by any of a number of packages.  A quick
`apt-file search sbin/halt` turns up

  $ apt-file search sbin/halt
  bfh-container: /sbin/halt
  finit-sysv: /sbin/halt
  molly-guard: /sbin/halt
  progress-linux-container: /sbin/halt
  runit-init: /sbin/halt
  systemd-sysv: /sbin/halt
  sysvinit-core: /sbin/halt

Mine happens to be

  $ ls -l /sbin/halt
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 10 03:45 /sbin/halt -> /lib/runit/shutdown

where the symlink target is from the runit package.  According to the
manual page, my halt command only supports -f, -w and -n short options.

The /etc/init.d/halt script may invokes the halt command with -d and -f
options and may add any of -i, -p and -h.

BTW, I also have runit-init installed which provides the `poweroff` and
`halt` commands that get executed.  Seeing that runit-init depends on
initscripts one could argue that runit-init should support those options
in which case feel free to forward this to that package (in the Debian
BTS).  From past experience, its maintainer is open to init freedom ;-)

If not a runit-init issue, this may still be worthwhile to upstream to
the Debian BTS for initscripts.  Even the systemd-sysv `halt` does not
claim to support -i or -h options in its manual page :-o

-- System Information:
Architecture: x86_64

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: runit (via /run/runit.stopit)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages initscripts depends on:
ii  sysv-rc         3.06-2devuan1
ii  sysvinit-utils  3.06-2devuan1

Versions of packages initscripts recommends:
ii  e2fsprogs  1.46.6-1
pn  psmisc     <none>

initscripts suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen

------------=_1687242722-7710-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 749-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 20 Jun 2023 06:31:34 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f8:140:32a1::58c6:6473]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id IvS4KJVHkWT6RAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:45 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 9A0A5615; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4132D29
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3])
	by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D927923
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:30:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 8847 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:39 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:30:39 +0100
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fixed in Debian #1032943
Message-ID: <ZJFHjz3rmHNATEx/@hindley.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Version: 2.1.2-55
------------=_1687242722-7710-0--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#749 closed by Mark Hindley <[email protected]> (Fixed in
 Debian #1032943)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <ZJFHjz3rmHNATEx/@hindley.org.uk> <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: they-closed 749
X-Devuan-PR-Package: runit-init
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: debian
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:32:04 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1687242724-7710-1"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1687242724-7710-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the runit-init package:

#749: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options

It has been closed by Mark Hindley <[email protected]>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Mark Hindley <mark@hin=
dley.org.uk> by
replying to this email.


--=20
749: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D749
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

------------=_1687242724-7710-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 749-done) by bugs.devuan.org; 20 Jun 2023 06:31:34 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f8:140:32a1::58c6:6473]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id IvS4KJVHkWT6RAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:45 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 9A0A5615; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4132D29
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3])
	by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D927923
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:30:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 8847 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:39 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:30:39 +0100
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fixed in Debian #1032943
Message-ID: <ZJFHjz3rmHNATEx/@hindley.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Version: 2.1.2-55
------------=_1687242724-7710-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 8 Mar 2023 12:25:37 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:25:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id 6JWxIWt+CGTnLQAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 12:24:11 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 77B6796F; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 12:24:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=202.238.237.3; helo=mo-sw.mose-mail.jp; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mo-sw.mose-mail.jp (mo-sw1801-0.mose-mail.jp [202.238.237.3])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45DD5895
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 12:24:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mo-sw.mose-mail.jp (mose-mo-sw1801) id 328CNvXR009297; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:23:57 +0900
Received: from basecamp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mbox.mose-mail.jp (mose-mbox1802) id 328CNrAu007501
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:23:54 +0900
Received: from olaf (uid 1000)
	(envelope-from [email protected])
	id 19f426
	by basecamp (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13);
	Wed, 08 Mar 2023 21:23:53 +0900
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.2
From: Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Subject: initscripts: /etc/init.d/halt calls halt with unsupported options
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 20:44:01 +0900
Message-ID: <874jqv5t46.fsf@basecamp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Package: initscripts
Version: 3.06-2devuan1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Olaf Meeuwissen <[email protected]>

Dear Maintainer,

Every time I `poweroff` my machine, I see error message flash by that
complain about `halt` being called with unsupported options.  I think
I have tracked this down to /etc/init.d/halt making blind assumptions
about the options supported by the `halt` command.

Said command may be provided by any of a number of packages.  A quick
`apt-file search sbin/halt` turns up

  $ apt-file search sbin/halt
  bfh-container: /sbin/halt
  finit-sysv: /sbin/halt
  molly-guard: /sbin/halt
  progress-linux-container: /sbin/halt
  runit-init: /sbin/halt
  systemd-sysv: /sbin/halt
  sysvinit-core: /sbin/halt

Mine happens to be

  $ ls -l /sbin/halt
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 10 03:45 /sbin/halt -> /lib/runit/shutdown

where the symlink target is from the runit package.  According to the
manual page, my halt command only supports -f, -w and -n short options.

The /etc/init.d/halt script may invokes the halt command with -d and -f
options and may add any of -i, -p and -h.

BTW, I also have runit-init installed which provides the `poweroff` and
`halt` commands that get executed.  Seeing that runit-init depends on
initscripts one could argue that runit-init should support those options
in which case feel free to forward this to that package (in the Debian
BTS).  From past experience, its maintainer is open to init freedom ;-)

If not a runit-init issue, this may still be worthwhile to upstream to
the Debian BTS for initscripts.  Even the systemd-sysv `halt` does not
claim to support -i or -h options in its manual page :-o

-- System Information:
Architecture: x86_64

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: runit (via /run/runit.stopit)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages initscripts depends on:
ii  sysv-rc         3.06-2devuan1
ii  sysvinit-utils  3.06-2devuan1

Versions of packages initscripts recommends:
ii  e2fsprogs  1.46.6-1
pn  psmisc     <none>

initscripts suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen

------------=_1687242724-7710-1--