Devuan logs - #860, boring messages


Message sent to [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:


X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#860: util-linux: more when waiting for keyboard response has 100 percent cpu utilisation
Reply-To: Arthur Marsh <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Arthur Marsh <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:47:52 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: report 860
X-Devuan-PR-Package: util-linux
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
X-Devuan-PR-Source: util-linux
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B.172679673523516
          (code B); Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:47:52 +0000
Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 20 Sep 2024 01:45:35 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:45:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id KsXiNHjT7GbLSAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:44:24 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id EE21D647; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:44:22 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=internode.on.net [email protected] header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=202309 header.b=ZMZs1Vtr;
	dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=103.150.252.0; helo=omr000.pc5.atmailcloud.com; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from omr000.pc5.atmailcloud.com (omr000.pc5.atmailcloud.com [103.150.252.0])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3114F
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=internode.on.net; s=202309; h=Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type; bh=2V0hxe8vr/JKvAtfyFtyD0cC+H0JCth+sMZ45iKL0KQ=; b=ZMZs1Vtrf+9y
	tezaoNOrhT2ysMNH9ITTVCFgpod7CtFPAOlR6XKKDww9HZJlOVWzuSDH/tqoks1tgguf+yQ8EKsoJ
	t1YWqvo9QQpkivQ6Ah+FwXwAJAKPxW0Tb2TYTF68xfOQ1DrXS2qQIf4ISl35j+yATWnzR0s3oEOtn
	2+jns6Ll3NpKKrNeUN9ZxZYrZfiqzEyMKNPQH8kapRFmvKQW7nuemCbencqz+NON9TQb8sH0bVuNi
	lKEiwO/qK6mMPM5oDg90VcktWs50XA8hd6wsE8xsljiAlNuD9YRodO7NgOOyF49FYfIgNKWUWW25o
	NTk9rsBQkXMXVo18EjQsPQ==;
Received: from CMR-KAKADU01.i-02175a00542f9bb7e
	 by OMR.i-011229ae50fa0cd71 with esmtps
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1srSge-0000000042d-2fag
	for [email protected];
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:43:56 +0000
Received: from [203.173.7.72] (helo=localhost)
	 by CMR-KAKADU01.i-02175a00542f9bb7e with esmtpsa
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1srSge-000000001jX-1NKG;
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:43:56 +0000
Received: from amarsh04 by localhost with local (Exim 4.98)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1srSgc-00000000258-1Xwv;
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:13:54 +0930
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Arthur Marsh <[email protected]>
To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost>
X-Mailer: reportbug 13.0.1+devuan1
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:13:54 +0930
X-Atmail-Id: [email protected]
X-atmailcloud-spam-action: no action
X-Cm-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=S/DfwpsP c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=66ecd35c a=q73fGBFtUWUW5y4nvQjQTA==:117 a=q73fGBFtUWUW5y4nvQjQTA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=EaEq8P2WXUwA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=DFekfw7Nys0QQgjvXCUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-Cm-Envelope: MS4xfFTnCEhpWYaQjW2J/kq3Ho0FsNzEirc5aooFRYz5sdGg7TH85QhzihNmQgseYv1h2SuqLRhH76SvPDr0TPfSdaZHsdnDiy4eKSCMnqVLKHgmWG0wBfHF UKb+7d0vnjxUZCvdrLhUbQW9llmjdVYwywdQARol8efsdbJsrEuov47k6uyZ8W0aWJkjwxUGjhatNQ==
X-atmailcloud-route: unknown

Package: util-linux
Version: 2.40.2-8devuan1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

In a directory with lots of files I typed:

ls -t|more

while the more command was waiting for keyboard input, cpu utilisation on the
cpu core with the more executable went up to 100 percent.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Distributor ID:	Devuan
Description:	Devuan GNU/Linux 6 (excalibur/ceres)
Release:	6
Codename:	excalibur ceres
Architecture: x86_64

Kernel: Linux 6.10.0-rc6+ (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages util-linux depends on:
ii  libblkid1       2.40.2-8devuan1
ii  libc6           2.40-2
ii  libcap-ng0      0.8.5-2
ii  libcrypt1       1:4.4.36-5
ii  libeudev1       3.2.14-2
ii  libmount1       2.40.2-8devuan1
ii  libpam-modules  1.5.3-7
ii  libpam-runtime  1.5.3-7
ii  libpam0g        1.5.3-7
ii  libselinux1     3.7-3
ii  libsmartcols1   2.40.2-8devuan1
ii  libtinfo6       6.5-2
ii  libuuid1        2.40.2-8devuan1

Versions of packages util-linux recommends:
ii  sensible-utils  0.0.24

Versions of packages util-linux suggests:
ii  dosfstools          4.2-1.1
ii  kbd                 2.6.4-2
ii  util-linux-extra    2.40.2-8devuan1
ii  util-linux-locales  2.40.2-8devuan1
pn  wtmpdb              <none>

-- debconf information:
  util-linux/noauto-with-nonzero-passnum:

Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: [email protected]
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
To: Arthur Marsh <[email protected]>
Subject: bug#860: Acknowledgement (util-linux: more when waiting for
 keyboard response has 100 percent cpu utilisation)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: ack 860
X-Devuan-PR-Package: util-linux
X-Devuan-PR-Source: util-linux
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:47:54 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with Devuan.

You can follow progress on this bug here: 860: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/=
bugreport.cgi?bug=3D860.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Devuan Developers <[email protected]>

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to [email protected].

Please do not send mail to [email protected] unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
860: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D860
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

Message sent to [email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>:


X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: bug#860: util-linux: more when waiting for keyboard response has 100 percent cpu utilisation
Reply-To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Resent-From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:48:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 860
X-Devuan-PR-Package: util-linux
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost> <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost>
X-Devuan-PR-Source: util-linux
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B860.17268148014519
          (code B ref 860); Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:48:01 +0000
Received: (at 860) by bugs.devuan.org; 20 Sep 2024 06:46:41 +0000
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id IMfwLi4a7WaZVgAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:06 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 95852189; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD16A4E
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3])
	by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C609B3;
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:46:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 30428 invoked by uid 1000);
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:46:02 +0100
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Arthur Marsh <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost>

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo

Arthur,

Thanks. However, I am unable to reproduce this behaviour.

What filesystem are you using?

Can you reproduce this with a command that doesn't touch the filesystem? Maybe:

 read | more

I wonder if it is a specific filesystem effect on your system and it is ls -t
that is consuming CPU rather than more.

If you try without the -t flag, does that change the behaviour?

Mark

Message received at [email protected]:


Received: (at 860) by bugs.devuan.org; 20 Sep 2024 06:46:41 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id IMfwLi4a7WaZVgAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:06 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 95852189; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD16A4E
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3])
	by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C609B3;
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:46:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 30428 invoked by uid 1000);
	Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:46:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:46:02 +0100
From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
To: Arthur Marsh <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: bug#860: util-linux: more when waiting for keyboard response has
 100 percent cpu utilisation
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <172679663435.7947.11335288698257655913.reportbug@localhost>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo

Arthur,

Thanks. However, I am unable to reproduce this behaviour.

What filesystem are you using?

Can you reproduce this with a command that doesn't touch the filesystem? Maybe:

 read | more

I wonder if it is a specific filesystem effect on your system and it is ls -t
that is consuming CPU rather than more.

If you try without the -t flag, does that change the behaviour?

Mark

Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.

Devuan Bugs Owner <[email protected]>.
Last modified: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:39:01 UTC