mark <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.mark <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.mark <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.mark <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.mark <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.mark <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.Received: (at 883) by bugs.devuan.org; 2 Apr 2025 16:12:04 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16) for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from email.devuan.org by email.devuan.org with LMTP id aHUfG5Nh7WeaJAAAmSBk0A (envelope-from <[email protected]>) for <[email protected]>; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:10:59 +0000 Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id 3279B395; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:10:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86]) by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E6081; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3]) by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id CD4E9EF; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 17:10:57 +0100 (BST) Received: (nullmailer pid 2858 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:10:57 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 17:10:57 +0100 From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]> To: Opty <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Merge bugs Message-ID: <[email protected]> References: <CAERDJOGPwrRp+GZuUNPPT93++x6Md+uhN+bsNu-V9cBJ1oq-Rw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAERDJOFJ7CDBvBdUYtnZQwvdwX6MoctR1J9rjV0NHRua5seSuA@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CAERDJOFJ7CDBvBdUYtnZQwvdwX6MoctR1J9rjV0NHRua5seSuA@mail.gmail.com> Control: forcemerge 881 -1 On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Opty wrote: > Please see #881 or should I copy the story here as well? No. Really these are all the same issue. I will merge them for now while we look at the detail. Mark
Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
:Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
.
Full text available.[email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
:bug#883
; Package rsyslog
.
Full text available.Received: (at 883) by bugs.devuan.org; 2 Apr 2025 11:58:44 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16) for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 02 Apr 2025 11:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from email.devuan.org by email.devuan.org with LMTP id SNuwOmkm7Wf8FwAAmSBk0A (envelope-from <[email protected]>) for <[email protected]>; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 11:58:33 +0000 Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id D8710395; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 11:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com [email protected] header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=lUGhir3Z; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2001:4860:4864:20::36; helo=mail-oa1-x36.google.com; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> Received: from mail-oa1-x36.google.com (mail-oa1-x36.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::36]) by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B3F81 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 11:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa1-x36.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2c77ef933e5so557750fac.0 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 04:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743595111; x=1744199911; darn=bugs.devuan.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RevgEDcugZ0B/4mqGXYKYuGQ7gL/1sI35jAN4YE8aq4=; b=lUGhir3Z/L1edDsJZB5wh+JtX/sExbVLc/Tz/jWsYRf5VP1DkkpVsRNhLGefNBh3rA jyQbfN6Lyhb7WhRl2+eRJ+7w6ip2n/iVQenJkWBRxpr0IlkCt51hJINGlejNNjzJ9+kS MPF+rrim4hvdTw2/mww1t4xTkEFR6Mnb4B0CW5vcqBBveLnrHKEnqFtkfyEwPN0cfkaE dDyJyRQGsaUKjGWsyG6qIQFCf3EIuGoXKUNHU42IUKGF5yBCNDVSsJrUUmsjvir2KFHn 22rjnau9sbAffbVqpR7ugW4sYURopmMzp/9FCX5PX58/ukcx7mBY42OC+VycsqIaQeLb HwHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743595111; x=1744199911; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RevgEDcugZ0B/4mqGXYKYuGQ7gL/1sI35jAN4YE8aq4=; b=hFL5q/NpH46P/zAoxrymtnrOyupycu2JCJAjSu/i/D0hJjkHbiuVGmsT3jX/Zzxr/j CN4rangwDo5scOvNIW0bi0gqq7M/Ao9Z7SkQvrI+HSzkb2ScL2w56MdlzdXDosS47TEE 1IG4ACcU7XUVofYNSp4r8trDYWdCoF09E+/eEexIZkEKOA9prWZmtiLMV/wrrM6gQ48x PT7AnPGjSg+bpKT8JVhi8PCjlEkDu3e3TWWgq1GrBz3SYKOAlVOnZtX6p6ssxNqZLOxw 1nhbuShIpd0Et+5bzbZCmj0DvvfZWhkdnKDU6XaVDq0eIxxlhZnVQNDmDU3itVoKMRkm LA4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywk/y5PuA/EPiOmLDghKtsVR/mj3fk3QAs5nyZzNs1JwSgOKSCf 4qFi5zZJaWRQop/g9pZRKYZdqbKWd8siUi5p3bFb1ST7aay7VW0ZLBGPa0JwF2WZY9DfDYwU1RV WUQ+9QhjJRvA55aewjBlMDwSDWuk= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctbk8Ahfm2CogLZpwYU0eL890fb9rLUY5KVxTYhbxoD+FFSpJ4DWxTQfg+8sJb 6nD/RsWxHRoa5ekm62vpCbzXEFbutstY4nenCtQ6AX8zEJr9PFlQKOd7EUXGTMKJuWScUuJdFTd PId1Y/pF1jDHodvlA4IOTNiPy1pSm1t3kjOOV1y6kq05Qx X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGBlMT4Gv+JjJfqyLWSAeR7tVMilUgF0EZTDk8icCmLn3L0kiaJeMmhg4bIsuwpX/LIJ8klUJlwaNV54G5bzSY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1581:b0:3f4:210e:c0f2 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-40026be4510mr1429540b6e.0.1743595110971; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 04:58:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAERDJOGPwrRp+GZuUNPPT93++x6Md+uhN+bsNu-V9cBJ1oq-Rw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> From: Opty <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:58:20 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JpBGk8QDne9c7hHGcDSNa-B0u87pUR0Iz-nhEDtH253Tkiijs7gZyl1kCs Message-ID: <CAERDJOFJ7CDBvBdUYtnZQwvdwX6MoctR1J9rjV0NHRua5seSuA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug#883: /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d To: Mark Hindley <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 6:41=E2=80=AFPM Mark Hindley <[email protected]> w= rote: > Why do you have policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all installed anyway? I suppo= se the > rationale goes that if you deny starting services in the first place, you= don't > need to rotate the logs because they will be empty/unchanged. Please see #881 or should I copy the story here as well? Regards, Opty
Opty <[email protected]>
:Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
.
Full text available.[email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
:bug#883
; Package rsyslog
.
Full text available.Mark Hindley <[email protected]>
to [email protected]
.
Full text available.Received: (at 883) by bugs.devuan.org; 1 Apr 2025 16:42:10 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16) for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from email.devuan.org by email.devuan.org with LMTP id XzfaHy4X7GfcRgAAmSBk0A (envelope-from <[email protected]>) for <[email protected]>; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:41:18 +0000 Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id 6356F5A0; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86]) by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D692D3AD for <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 16:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3]) by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 26C02130; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 17:41:17 +0100 (BST) Received: (nullmailer pid 13012 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:41:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 17:41:16 +0100 From: Mark Hindley <[email protected]> To: Opty <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: bug#883: /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d Message-ID: <[email protected]> References: <CAERDJOGPwrRp+GZuUNPPT93++x6Md+uhN+bsNu-V9cBJ1oq-Rw@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CAERDJOGPwrRp+GZuUNPPT93++x6Md+uhN+bsNu-V9cBJ1oq-Rw@mail.gmail.com> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 02:44:45PM +0200, Opty wrote: > Package: rsyslog > Version: 8.2302.0-1+deb12u1devuan1 > > /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate uses invoke-rc.d to notify rsyslog to > reopen logs but it doesn't work when using > policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all so shouldn't the logrotate > configuration snippet use rather 'service' ? Possibly, although all the other logrotate fragments I can find use invoke-rc.d. Why do you have policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all installed anyway? I suppose the rationale goes that if you deny starting services in the first place, you don't need to rotate the logs because they will be empty/unchanged. Mark
[email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
:bug#883
; Package rsyslog
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 1 Apr 2025 12:45:18 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16) for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from email.devuan.org by email.devuan.org with LMTP id YKN0AMzf62fuJQAAmSBk0A (envelope-from <[email protected]>) for <[email protected]>; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:45:00 +0000 Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id DE0465A0; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com [email protected] header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=CKopFHIO; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2001:4860:4864:20::29; helo=mail-oa1-x29.google.com; [email protected]; receiver=<UNKNOWN> Received: from mail-oa1-x29.google.com (mail-oa1-x29.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::29]) by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BBE33AD for <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa1-x29.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2c7ee8295dcso403564fac.3 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 05:44:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743511496; x=1744116296; darn=bugs.devuan.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uQY1wfeodyvojTp/kU2qh7KG93C8ZyY07R8kNC6VBI8=; b=CKopFHIOwW6Z3bD94XMNxCfpJfTVhjXE5G6S++dNcpzNty6Dwz16+Co9qXo7OYpWGo Sd33OyG+9zswXv40NWfr1cNNpfhMa68embdo9PXguNUqBAhokHUanlP+1vionY/aZQrv ng1DwwS2DyqROixCEs9GQQAWLLeIcLFj37Oj95VcOT1DAzbs9Dm5orE9CLwI20AE46+E 4Rh1sIs/29unscvOQaqRKhd3clZMD3ZKQMmuaV+6t4FhlZOrlQr3LAdAfdf4YDwAS0I/ cLhmB+KZyh4uF2PwqJgHRxN2xL7TRrs9OX3vA3EyYVrC3pwUJZhc71jVOWbq69i6+rxX tQMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743511496; x=1744116296; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uQY1wfeodyvojTp/kU2qh7KG93C8ZyY07R8kNC6VBI8=; b=NNyaPZgPoi3p6rzMz8QqW0i7Q1ahqEb39gfZOHgx3OoQyfeSjjnK6cClz0CaryFplc v/KyXVhtEjdkejXPDSZZEmsZoaXczodt44H/bD30Tjw5T8c8m2Y07v4W+t5XJr8CmBMF MpP+Js0E5GhSrzN5wU8NDMlGn6pGsY1efj9Y22M4WES1Ong7nEotaFxW4uFKUccLrRNc EFAJOs+Jb1H2CueN5PP9rMsujgun5byOKx/Xr4NTdpb1BLXeqj3hL8Ifn9J5Vi9ssVi2 ADFyfl+zWm0vKJEpBKRBSkdjftXseVGqkrwB0c9pNUxw2Jz+n7hvrpYriam4Vf6wIa1f OQNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz6pR8kU5bV1dyPxX/wRwfmO6h20DIWTsVzpi4ueXiwgPYQKvLF OaZbt5NQPJjjJ3ihUUF8TZGWg8tH+fESvjJFVJsQ9OWM+pB9aG7EqQyB1Rpd2yBB9WBbmKfZwtt sC/OcBGR44g2I/BR+utV6lvANFtgUdrx7 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs6ugBKmAuElRjfu79QRKDrc4CL4I+KiN1B+CyWbpar4raPpycq0JqbDHaxbjz xR336taxxy4ab+mvoQJzWwB/CNUGai2UvVTW9gBK35LQ5YxdYE9PzwPyB5wwAUdY3HqBBtucOCN 4lS6j6lAR1fIJ6DkFvfx1yYmIMy4I3lD0CUQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFfy+uM2q1bZ9eecWGY4Y3nknRrcftSvU5a1JGU4TVQ5RRtnQzEjS5Dr11fCZ0pn5X5gvzd22pVQkGGA6Z3esU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1387:b0:3f4:af5:1d83 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-40029e36b5emr568377b6e.3.1743511496105; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 05:44:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Opty <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:44:45 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jr4TsFt0X37pqNif_pn5Jw0qRUB74fUoLreZsLjL8NbA6P6nNSCff9qpwk Message-ID: <CAERDJOGPwrRp+GZuUNPPT93++x6Md+uhN+bsNu-V9cBJ1oq-Rw@mail.gmail.com> Subject: /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d To: [email protected] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Package: rsyslog Version: 8.2302.0-1+deb12u1devuan1 /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate uses invoke-rc.d to notify rsyslog to reopen logs but it doesn't work when using policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all so shouldn't the logrotate configuration snippet use rather 'service' ? Regards, Opty
Opty <[email protected]>
:Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
.
Full text available.[email protected], Devuan Developers <[email protected]>
:bug#883
; Package rsyslog
.
Full text available.Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.
Devuan Bugs Owner <[email protected]>.
Last modified:
Fri, 4 Apr 2025 22:39:02 UTC